Licensed eternally for a very small one-time payment. This is the most significant differentiator between MailEnable and other vendors. Significantly inhibited the adoption of Exchange by ISPs and hosting providers. In particular, the per-seat licensing model has For larger organizations, theĬost of providing Exchange becomes considerable. Licensing: More Mailboxes Without Increased CostĮxchange is licensed under a per-seat (client access license) model. Routine tasks required of an enterprise-grade mail server, with only a recommendation for reading the A novice administrator is able to manage all the Understanding of DNS and basic TCP/IP networking. MailEnable by comparison, is much simpler to install and maintain, and only requires a rudimentary This but to some degree it is haunted by its past. There is no doubt that newer versions have improved So too has the complexity of its implantation. Unfortunately for Exchange, it has established a reputation of being difficult to deploy, configureĪnd maintain, perhaps as a result of the scope of features that it provides. Administration: MCP-less Configuration and Management Including free and busy status, collaboration and delegation, global address list access, and publicįolders, all of which are available in MailEnable Premium. Many other features are not supported by a synchronisation add-in either, Of integration supported by both MailEnable and Exchange goes well beyond this, with real-time Update an Outlook client with any server changes to items such as calendars and contacts. A synchronisation add-in will periodically In reality, such approaches represent nothing like an Exchange experience, and not evenĪnything like what is available in MailEnable Premium. Some vendors present products with "Outlook integration" that are implemented as synchronisationĪdd-ins. Interoperability without actually requiring Exchange. Scheduling of appointments and meeting invitations, with free and busy status, as well as support forĭescription of Enterprise Premium for details). MailEnable's solution provides the primary functionality which any business requires, including Simply, anyone who claims to compete as a functional replacement is kidding themselves - and their Functionality: Apples With Applesįrom a functionality perspective, Microsoft Exchange is exhaustive and in a class of its own. Who position themselves as an 'Exchange Replacement' or 'Exchange Alternative'. This is an attempt to provide an objective comparison of MailEnable, Microsoft Exchange and vendors
0 kommentar(er)
